The defendant claimed that the injury was the fault of the plaintiff, who allegedly walked between the two vehicles when he was crushed. The defendant also claimed that some of the plaintiff’s injuries were unrelated to this case.
Video surveillance caught the circumstances of the plaintiff’s injuries on camera. Unfortunately, the injury occurred during the time when the defendant’s truck obscured the view.
Liability depended on the jury being able to fully visualize exactly what happened, based on pre- and post-incident positions of the plaintiff. Mr. Blumberg needed a comprehensive and powerful visual animation to illustrate the incident and extent of his client’s injuries.