In this case, a pregnant mother sought prenatal care from the defendant Healthcare Corporation’s nurse midwife. The midwife had the knowledge and skill of an OBGYN, except she could not perform a cesarean section. She had only two years of experience since graduating from midwife school, she had zero experience with shoulder dystocia, and she skipped the voluntary medical training for how to safely deliver a baby when shoulder dystocia occurs.
The mother, who had gestational diabetes, had commented that the baby seemed “very big” but the midwife ignored her. Without taking an ultrasound, the midwife told the mother the baby would be about 6 lbs, but the baby ended up being 11.5 lbs.
During delivery, the midwife “pulled, twisted and yanked” the baby’s head around 180 degrees with so much excessive force that she pulled nerves from the baby’s spinal cord, broke his arm, and destroyed the baby’s brachial plexus nerve system. A biomechanical engineer testified that the defendant used “seven to eight times the average traction used in routine delivery.” An episiotomy was required to deliver the baby using a vaginal incision.
Had the midwife taken the baby’s size and the mother’s inconclusive gestational diabetes test results into consideration, she would have known that shoulder dystocia was a major possibility, which would have enabled her and her team to prepare properly. Instead, she chose to continue the vaginal birth with excessive force until the baby’s arm was paralyzed.